Main image
26th May
2009
written by Jeremy

Thanks to YouTube and my fellow contributor to this site Harpuia, I’ve started watching Indoctrinate U. It’s a student film about how public universities in the United States are acting more as indoctrination centers than educational facilities as they are supposed to be. It’s pretty disturbing, watching supposedly rational people acting so knee-jerk about social issues because of what they’re taught in college, and it strikes a distinct chord with me because I did drift significantly from my conservative heritage just in the one year I attended the University of Oklahoma.

However, I didn’t drift as far left as some of the people shown in that film. Whether due to a factor of my inquisitive nature or the short time I was a college student, I didn’t drift any further than moderate. If anything, I dropped off from any solid political leanings due to my cynicism. Looking at this film, I consider myself to be extremely lucky. I also have to wonder just how the idea of “liberal thinking is the only thinking worth thinking” became considered such a good idea.

I mean, history tells us that cultural uniformity is more often a destructive force. The most successful civilizations, such as the Greek and Romans, allowed their people to flourish in their gifts. The Renaissance was so awesome because so many talented people in many different areas of expertise popped up almost all at once and began to change the world, starting from where they were. On the flip side, a sense of cultural uniformity lead to events like the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the Holocaust.

Not only does history warn us about the dangers of uniformity, so do literature and cinema. “1984″, “The Giver”, “Brave New World”, and many others all say that when we give up our individuality and our freedom, we become less than human. So too do movies like “Equilibrium”. That specific movie centers around a world where “peace” has been created through the death of emotion caused by a drug called Prozium, but that “peace” has to be maintained through strict laws and the violent destruction of anything emotion-provoking and anyone who is acting emotional. Alas, that kind of dystopian future is more likely to happen in this day and age than one would realize.

Are there unifying ideals that are not destructive? Yes, there are. The idea of becoming a better human race is indeed noble and should be striven for, but not at the cost of what makes human. What makes us different from animals is that we are all unique individuals, capable of figuring things out in our own way, although in some ways we may need the help of others to help us get started. Ultimately, though, each person has their own path and must find it in their own way. If we fail to truly embrace diversity, either suppressing or artificially enhancing it (the latter of which ends up acting the same as suppression), we will begin to kill our humanity. Our souls, if you will forgive the terminology, should be more precious to us than any other resource, because there is nothing we can get in return for the loss of the individual.

Consider this: do all pixels on a computer screen show the exact same color? If they do, there is nothing but one solid color, which is usually a sign that something is not working properly. Beautiful images and inspiring works of art, whether image-based or text-based, are only created by variances in color and in brightness of each individual pixel. Even black text on a white screen (or vice versa) is based on variations in color and brightness. This is not a fluke, people; this is how nature works. Nature itself is heterogeneous, with oceans and deserts, forests and prairies, mountains and plains. If the entire world was an ocean, it would be a very dull world; if the entire world was a desert, it would be unlivable.

Bottom line is that in order for us to be united, we all must first be unique. This may sound like a contradiction, but it is perfectly possible, as the Earth herself shows us. We will never be a successfully united human race until we find ways to use all of our various skills, talents, and philosophies in conjunction, rather than discard them for one perceived “complete” ideal. Look at the United Federation of Planets in the Star Trek universe. Their unity was only made possible because of the sharing of gifts, not only between human ethnic and social groups, but between races of intelligent beings throughout the galaxy. That is true unity. The social homogeneity being taught at our universities is a false unity…and a dangerous one.

3rd April
2009
written by User ImageJeremy

The more I talk a look at what’s going on with our Congress, spending ourselves further and further into debt, the more I realize how politics as usual has run its course. Unfortunately, our elected leaders seem to refuse to accept this and keep trucking on as if their political extremism is doing everything but killing this country in a slow and agonizing manner. Democrat Nancy Pelosi has, in her time as Speaker of the House, gotten away with suppression of debate on at least two occasions, all seemingly out of spite for the Republicans and so she can accomplish her goals on her time schedule. Today’s Democrats, as well as a large group of their supporters on the Internet, seem to be more concerned about lording over their current control rather than about actually getting what really needs to be done done. They’re bullying everyone, including moderate Dems, just so they can get their way.

My fellow Americans, this should not be.

Such behavior is destructive and is doing more harm than it is good. Instead of doing what needs to be done, such as bringing the people who have mismanaged OUR money to justice (Congress included), each individual Congressperson is more concerned with looking self-important and pushing an agenda rather than trying to actually make a real difference. This is why we’ve had multiple bailouts so far, none of which have worked. Congress, in their black-and-white tunnel vision, has lost sight of the ever useful proverb: “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”

An aside on the bailouts: if the problem is that money is being squandered, does it not stand to reason that throwing more money at the problem will only result in more money being squandered? And isn’t that what we’ve seen happen from the companies like AIG who have been bailed out? The bailout has only served to pour a firehose on the problem of mismanaged money by allegedly smart but apparently greedy people. There should be prosecution, not deluge after deluge. Take the buckets away from the people who are pouring water into the boat.

Returning to the original point: a mindset of “we are right; you are wrong, and we will slap you around until you agree with us” has been causing pain, not healing. What little Congress has managed to get done has only proven to be either a waste of time or, worse yet, worse than the disease it was intended to cure, much like a prescription pill’s side effects. Our country is dying, both in terms of domestic security and in international perception, and why? Because we are letting the political extremists take over.

We are a far cry from the level of political extremism as seen in other countries in the past, where political dissidents were silenced permanently for disagreeing with what was happening. However, it is not unlikely that the United States could well get to this point, though I don’t know how soon. But we can change our course, and we still have time to leave this highway to peril. We haven’t reached the last exit yet. But we’ve got to start changing things now, and we have to do it by insisting that those who are hellbent on pushing their own agendas, those who are determined to be divisive and bullies rather than uniters and peacemakers, those who are extremists should leave office. We do not need people like them in charge of us! Whether they are liberal or conservative, it doesn’t matter; speak with your vote and tell them where they can go (hint: not Congress). The time for extremism is over. If America is to survive at all, we have got to let go of our egos and our selfishness. And we have got to let go of those who know nothing but to be egotistical and selfish.

Rate this:
2.9
10th November
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

Congratulations, Senator President-Elect Barack Obama. You have won the Presidency. Good luck with that; you’re going to need it.

Truth is, despite the historical nature of having elected the first African-American President in this country’s history, not much in the US has changed. The economy is still reeling, there is still conflict in the Middle East, and the world still doesn’t care that much about us, even with “their boy” being elected. We’ve still got miles to go, and it’s not going to be easy. So, in the spirit of coming together, allow me to make a few suggestions as to what needs to be done going forward.

  1. Social Justice - You’re probably think I’ve gone soft on this, but there’s more a potential for the Obama administration to screw up here than you think. If there is really going to be change made by the Democrats, it has to start with being truly just. This means actually administering according to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. Champion rights for gay people. Give immigrants a fair shot at becoming US citizens (but please, still require a working knowledge of the English language). Be truly pro-choice, and let women have children if they want to have them. Most importantly, don’t let the rich get away with crimes. Make up for the mistakes of the bailouts by holding people accountable for their actions. Doing such may hurt us in the short term, but in the long run, it will do us a world of good.
  2. The Iraq Debacle - It’s not going to be as easy to fix this as one would think. We are too far in to just pull out in one shot. The best withdrawal plan I’ve heard of is a phased withdrawal; it might take a longer period of time than some people are comfortable with, but I believe it will be less harmful overall than if we just disappear in short order. The situation in Iraq [i]will[/i] destabilize if we just up and pull out.
  3. Religious Freedom - This is somewhat of a subset of the first mention point, but it is a bit of a concern. We cannot allow the United States of America to be even further unbalanced by persecution from any fringe group, be they fundamentalist or radical atheist. If Obama is truly the intelligent man he appears to be, surely he must recognize that the fringe groups are not the rule in all religions but rather the exception. He must condemn the extremists as separate groups from Christianity, Islam, and atheism. He must recommend that the greater community find ways to co-exist.
  4. Rebuild Independence -The only way the US can repair its relationships with other countries to become stronger within itself. This includes finding ways to develop its own energy and become less reliant on other nations. It also means that we must start producing and sending out as much or more than we take in. We’ve been falling behind in trade due to importing cheaper goods from China and other countries. Our own goods are taxed so as to make them too expensive to send out. This must change. Once the US is able to stand on its own two feet again, the world will take notice. We have not been able to do so for almost 60 years, since the second World War.

These are but a few of the things I would like to see happen in the next four years. Maybe some of them are pipe dreams, but I truly believe we’ve got a lot to do if the US is going to continue being a superpower, or even to regain that status. I’ll probably post up more in later days as I can think of them…and I’d like for all of us to write up, if only for ourselves, the causes we would be willing to fight for going forward. If nothing else, it’s an exercise that will hold a mirror up to ourselves, to see where we as individuals need to improve ourselves. After all, the rebuilding of America will start with us.

Rate this:
3.1 (1 person)
4th November
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

I feel so dirty…so filthy. I feel like I’ve enabled someone with a dangerous, potentially fatal habit. I feel like I’ve fed into the worst addiction of all…the addiction to power and money.

I didn’t vote for who I wanted to vote for. But in all fairness, I didn’t have much choice.

In the state of Oklahoma, the election laws state that you can only vote for Democrats or Republicans. You also cannot write in candidates. One could probably spin that as trying to stave off joke candidates, but honestly, if you can’t trust the voters to take voting seriously, why let them vote at all. These laws are a disguised way of suppressing choice, REAL choice. This makes me extremely angry, and I’d like to think that I’m not the only one. I don’t care what the reasons for these restrictions are; the restrictions themselves are an infringement upon our rights.

Maybe you’re out there in another state with similar laws. Maybe you’ve always accepted it as the status quo. I tell you, there is no reason to accept such an injustice. None at all. There is no reason to be forced to vote for someone you don’t believe in. The only reason I voted at all instead of storming out of the polling place was because I cared about the local races, but that doesn’t make me any less angry about being forced to vote for a Presidential candidate that I think is a dope. In fact, the fact that I voted means I have a right, nay, an obligation to point a finger at everything I think looks fishy.

It’s too late to change the laws for this election, but it’s not too late to change the laws for future elections. We need to start now. We need change the laws in Oklahoma, and possibly in other states, starting now. Let’s get this going, America. We have a right to vote for whoever the hell we want, not whoever the hell your state or the media wants. There has to be a change. It has to start NOW.

Rate this:
2.9
3rd November
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

Ugh. If there has ever been a longer election season than this one, both in relation to time and emotion, I’d like to know what it was. For somewhere around two years, The Chase for Power has been among the headlines all over the United States. And now, somewhat anti-climatically, two years of media frenzy will end in one night. Someone is going to be elected President of the United States. Personally, now more than ever, I am starting not to care who.

Don’t get me wrong. Should Obama win, I will be shuddering in anticipation over the inevitable gloating of the hyperliberals, proclaiming the beginning of a new age. If McCain somehow manages to win, I will also be shuddering over the prospects of four years of the Old and Beautiful (but hey, at least we’ll have Tina Fey). About the only prospect that would get me excited at this point would be for either Nader or Bob Barr to pop up out of nowhere and steal the election away in a stunning upset. But since the odds of that are becoming increasingly slim, when either one of the Big Two win, nothing is going to change. The only good thing about tomorrow, besides people getting out there to tell their Congresscritters whether or not they’re doing a good job, is that the campaigns will finally end.

After tomorrow, for at least the next two years, there will be no more hype, no more spin, no more bullshit. Lipstick will be something women use to make themselves more beautiful, not the spawning point of a media firestorm. No more pigs unless someone’s having a barbecue, no more pitbulls unless you’re talking about Michael Vick, and no more William Ayers references. The only battle for Washington that will matter is the Redskins’ race to get into the playoffs. Most importantly, the sun will still rise Wednesday morning, the sky will still be blue or grey, depending on cloud cover, and we will still be in an economic mess.

The world will not change much on November 5th. No matter who is elected, they won’t take office until January 20th, anyway. The only change that matters is that we, who have been held hostage by election coverage for around two years, will be freed from that bondage. This is not to say that political coverage will cease; it never does. There will still be scrutiny of Bush as he prepares to pass the dimly-lit torch to whomever comes next; Iraq will still be hell on Earth; the stock market will still so much like a roller-coaster that it might inspire Six Flags’ next epic thrill ride. But all the hype that had ever been accumulated over the election season will become meaningless. For the next two months and 15 days, we will be in a transitional stage. From hype to reality.

So tomorrow, go out there and vote your ass off. Hopefully, by now, you’ve found a candidate who aligns with you. It doesn’t matter who it is. I won’t say that this candidate will bring doom to us all or that candidate is the second coming of Christ, because honestly, I don’t believe that, and it wouldn’t matter anyway. Just go out there, exercise your right, and vote. And if you’re old enough to vote but haven’t registered to vote by now…shame on you. Your fate lies in the hands of the ones who have registered and will vote.

Whatever happens, happens. Whatever will be, will be. The important thing is that as of November 4th, 2008, the 2008 electoral season will finally end. Enjoy it while it lasts; the 2012 electoral season will probably begin in 2010. Good luck, y’all.

Rate this:
2.6 (1 person)
30th October
2008
written by User ImageHarpuia

1. Loren Baxter Invented the Internet
I swear, if I see one more Illuminati Pictures video nitpicking Obama on Youtube again, I’m going to go crazy. Half are exaggerated, and the others are just downright lies. The few-to-several truths they did throw in they seem to completely overlook four-some years ago when the other side were doing similar deeds.

2. The Media Decides This Election
Call me a right-wing whackjob if you want, but the media bias is so obvious against McCain/Palin and for Obama that it’s crazy. Spend hours on hours nitpicking every little problem Palin does, but won’t even spend one news segment on anything on Obama’s performance at Annenberg or, just recently conservatives are trying to surface, Obama’s citizenship status.

3. Ron Paul Was Right
Our current U.S. government spends, spends, spends. Both Republicans and Democrats don’t want us to take our beatings and deal with the coming recession now, and will rather bail out Wall Street and big corporate CEOs and pray they trickle down to the people. This would be great… if the rich bigwigs had a conscience, unfortunately, this country just can’t seem to run on good intentions anymore.

Ron Paul was the first one to say that something was wrong with our economy, and that is overspending, artificially low interest rates, and IMO, the rich/working-class gap. I give him his due. He may have looked like a crazy old guy in the Presidential primaries, but if we could redo the primaries again, I would proudly cast my vote for him, and will do so if he runs in 2012.

4. Neo-Cons Don’t Have a Monopoly on Verbal Assaults
Two years ago, I would’ve never believed it. 95% of the scarecrows, verbal attacks, and malicious remarks on boards I went to (including this one) have been done by conservatives, mostly neo-cons. Within the last year, I hate to say it, but I have seen liberals increasingly aggressive in their verbal attacks on conservatives.

While I believe Obama has ran a more positive race overall, the blogosphere and many of the Obama supporters on the net are amongst the most negative, hateful, bigoted, and disgusting people I’ve met. I sure would not want to meet them face to face. I would’ve expected this from conservatives, but from liberals, who until a few months ago have preached to be the more “tolerant” of the two sides, who have been just as harsh (if not a little more this election), I just say, you should know better.

5. Politics Sucks
Five days. I cannot wait until it’s over. In a way, I hope for Obama to win, but either way, I’m on a look and see basis for the two major candidates. Whoever wins will have a lot on their plate, and I’ll be waiting to see if the winner can fix the problems of the last eight years of the Bush administration.

Rate this:
3.9 (2 people)
14th October
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

I know, I know, I’ve probably said this before…but it’s been a belief of mine that you should vote with your heart and your head, not with the identification on your voter registration card. That’s the major reason why I’m a registered independent voter in the state of Oklahoma. I believe that I have the right to vote for whoever the hell I want, regardless of political affiliation. Which is why, in this upcoming Presidential election, I plan on voting for someone other than the two main candidates.

You may ask, “Why bother? No third-party candidate is going to win, not this year, and not ever!” And I’ll be honest with you…for a time, I did believe that this year was ripe for a third-party candidate to break through and steal the election away from the Big Two. Well, maybe if Ron Paul was running, it would have happened, but unfortunately, we are left with a choice that is no choice. It is almost assured that one of the Big Two candidates will win this election, and current polls project that person to be the Democratic candidate Barack Obama. So with such an apparently hopeless situation, why would someone like me ever want to waste their vote on a third-party candidate?

The answer is simple: I believe that the Republicans and Democrats do not have the best interests of the American people at heart. I believe that there are no Donkeys or Elephants anymore, but there sure are a lot of jackasses. I believe in the innermost parts of my being that neither John McCain nor Barack Obama are the best men to lead this country. Most importantly, I believe that it won’t matter which one of the two wins, because we are still in quite the pickle.

But this is not purely a gut-instinct decision for me. I’ve battled this back and forth just over the last month, and what I have seen from both of the mainstream candidates has given my head cause to fall in line with my heart. McCain and Obama both supported the bailout, which I opposed if for no other reason than accountability, and both sides have in different ways shown a disdain for not only their opponent but for anyone who isn’t voting their way. McCain and Palin have been drifting more neo-con-ward, making themselves look stupid (especially with Palin getting busted for abuse of power in Troopergate), showing hypocrisy by swearing to take the high road while their ads blast Obama’s alleged terrorist ties. And then there are the hyperliberals, bowing down before Obama’s golden idol and denigrating anyone who doesn’t support their boy as sub-human. I cannot support either of these two sides because I know they are two sides of the same coin, and that coin is self-interest. I cannot truly believe that either the Republicans or Democrats really care about anything other than their own power and their own money.

The late Frank Herbert’s twist on a classic axiom reigns true now more than ever: “Power attracts the corruptible, and absolute power attracts the absolutely corruptible.” The Republicans and Democrats both have been attracted to power, and all have proven themselves corruptible. They are running because they want control of the country for their party, not because they want to make the United States a better country than it was when they took office. The independent parties, however, have actual, solid stances and are wanting to really do things to shake this country up, and yet they are largely ignored by the media and the general populace. I bet you that you can’t name three of all the independent candidates and their parties; I myself can only name three parties and two candidates at most. Why? Because you never hear about them. The Big Two don’t want you to know about them, so they blitz the media with all their crap so the smaller voices don’t get heard. That’s not republican or democratic (not capitalized since I’m referencing the forms of government and not the parties), that’s oligarchical. It’s also beyond disgraceful.

If there is anyone out there still undecided, or maybe who have decided not to vote at all, I urge you to reconsider. This is the perfect opportunity to make a stand. So go out there and research Bob Barr, Ralph Nader, and all the other third-party candidates. Find one that aligns with your political ideals and vote for them on November 4th. Forget about McCain and Obama; we know enough about them already. So what if the indie candidates have an infinitesimal chance of winning? It is time to make a statement. Tell the Big Two to kiss off. Tell the government that there are still people in the country who care about the good of the nation as a whole. Tell our representatives in Washington that we will not stand for this suppression of our freedom of choice. It’s time to use your heart and your head. Vote smart, not stupid.

Rate this:
2.9
6th October
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

I’ve got a very important question for everyone out there who has said that anyone who doesn’t vote for Obama is an idiot.

What…the hell…are you doing?

Do you not realize that you are potentially hurting your boy’s chances instead of helping them? Are there not perfectly good reasons not to vote for someone that have nothing to do with race, political affiliation, or perceived religion? Perfectly good and, may I add, logical reasons, such as Obama’s political ideologies not aligning with one’s own?

Call me crazy, but I always thought you voted for the person you personally felt would be the best person to run the country for the next four years. In my world, using bullying tactics to try and convince people your way is not only the height of classlessness, it’s not likely to work, either. Then again, I was raised to trust my instincts as much as my head, and also (while I admittedly sometimes fail at this) to not let myself become arrogant and selfish. To me, it seems both arrogant and selfish to label someone as sub-human because they refuse to do any certain thing…and it is also outright hypocritical.

“Hypocritical?” you say. “Certainly not!” Certainly so, I say to you. The truth is, the people who claim themselves intellectually superior for supporting Barack Obama are the same people who condemn Christianity because of the bullying tactics used by some fundamentalists. These Obama supporters claim victimization from the evangelicals, then turn around and victimize anyone who dares to support McCain, Nader, Barr, or anyone whose initials are not BO. And believe me, I am not trying to defend fundamentalists here; I find them just as ridiculous as any thinking person. But yet at the same time, I fail to see how what these zealous supporters of Obama are doing is any different.

As a centrist myself, I was already planning not to support Obama. His policies don’t align with my ideals. It’s that simple. These tactics by the most vocal of Obama’s supporters have only pushed me even further away, especially when coupled by his support for the recent bailout that passed. There is no way in heaven or hell or on Earth that I can ever vote for him, because I refuse to be bullied. I was bullied enough when I was younger, and I will not be pushed around now. And I know I’m not the only one who feels this way, because I know of at least two other people who cannot stand this hypocrisy. How many more people on the edge could be pushed away because of these scare tactics?

There’s also something else. I have heard it said that if Obama does not win, there will be, for lack of a better phrase, hell to pay. I have heard it said that there will be riots and bloodshed. Is that really what this country needs? Are you, supporters of Obama, really willing to destroy this country even more that it is already being destroyed, all because your boy didn’t win? Are you really willing to let this country devolve into anarchy and destruction, all over an election? Then you are more petty than I thought. But I tend to consider this an idle threat. An empty promise, given by people just as hypocritical as those they claim to oppose. Little do they know that by trying to support Obama in this way, they have made themselves his worst enemies.

Rate this:
2.8
2nd October
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

These days, people love to blame others. Regardless of whether they got themselves into a mess or not, we in this country love to point the finger and everyone but ourselves. From the time that we are kids trying to get out of being punished for breaking the lamp to the time when we are adults who can’t accept their own stupidity, Americans love to say “Wasn’t me.” This can be a bit of a problem sometimes, though, as when everyone’s trying to pass the buck to someone else, it can often be confusing as to where the buck really stops. It often leads to what the Queen of Hearts did to the card who painted her white roses red…everyone gets punished for it regardless. This ducking of responsibility even goes as high as our government.

No one wants to step up and take the flack for the semi-debacle that is the Iraq War. Bush doesn’t want to admit he sent our soldiers off on flawed intelligence, the CIA doesn’t want to admit that their intelligence was flawed, and Congress doesn’t want to admit that they allowed Bush to go to war. Same way with the economy. No one wants to take responsibility for causing our economic downward spiral, not the government, not the financial companies…not anyone. And so we have the bailout.

I’ve mentioned this before, but AIG and all the rest MISHANDLED THEIR BUSINESS. They made bad deals, gave out bad loans to people who can’t pay them off anyway, and gave out huge lines of credit like they were giving money to charity. They screwed up. Why now are people perfectly content with letting these companies pass the blame and the consequences onto the people of the United States?

Despite my best hopes, the bailout…excuse me, “rescue plan”, is still alive because the Senate passed the bill 74-25. This is quite the turnover from Monday’s 225-208 rejection by the House. Whether it was because of the record drop on Monday or the rebound the day after, but mostly because of the media pounding it into people’s heads that the failure of the bailout was a tragedy, enough Senators were swayed to bring life back into Frankenstein’s monster. And just like Frankenstein’s monster, this bailout is going to wreak havoc on our towns and cities…through our wallets.

We are refusing to hold the true culprits for the mortgage and house crises responsible. We are refusing to point the finger at the banks and credit companies and saying, “You mismanaged our money. We demand accountability from you!” Instead, we are letting the same “don’t blame me” culture that sparks frivolous lawsuits put a gun to the head of our economy. We are letting ourselves fall in the very trap that President Thomas Jefferson did everything he could to prevent us from getting into…becoming overly-reliant on the rest of the world. Jefferson’s “let alone” policy lead us to an era of unparalleled expansion and strength, and it was in those times at the turn of the 19th century that forged a fledgling country into a world-effecting nation. In the last half-century or so, however, we have undone everything that was done in the first century and a quarter to make us strong, and now we have become as dependent on the world as the world has been on us.

We have allowed this country to become weakened all because we can’t take responsibility for our own problems. To compensate, we have to get ourselves involved in everyone else’s problems so no one recognizes just how screwed up we here in America are getting. The way to begin getting ourselves out of this hole begins with realizing that we are our own worst enemies. Not terrorists, not socialism…the problem lies with us. Once we own up to that and decide to clean up our own messes, that’s when the US will begin to regain not only its internal integrity but its relationships with other countries…relationships that we forged while we were learning to be a self-reliant republic. And one of the first steps to that is to go to the people responsible for the mortgage crisis and telling them where they can go and what they can do when they get there with what uncomfortable object.

Rate this:
2.8
1st October
2008
written by User ImageJeremy

Whether or not Obama supporters on the individual level believe it personally, there is a perception that Obama is going to save us all. I’ve heard it on talk radio and I’ve seen it on the internet; people are bowing down before the Altar of Obama, praying that their knight in shining armor will come and save them.

Pardon my skepticism here, but perception can be a dangerous thing. Especially when it’s a flawed perception.

I am personally no more ready to accept Obama as my personal President and savior than I am to hand over the keys to a senior citizen. It seems a little outrageous to assume that one man will turn the world upside-down in one night and wipe away everything that is wrong in this country. Heck, it took Jesus three days, plus another 50 before his disciples even decided to go spread his teachings. And that’s even if you believe he was no more than a good teacher.

The thing is, the cult-like aura around Obama surpasses even Ron Paul’s following in scope and fervor, and Ron Paul was considered the candidate for our future when he was running. Just as I couldn’t escape Ron Paul back a year ago, today, you can’t escape the Obama love.

The Obama crowd even has its radicals, hyperliberals with enough fervor to make the most hardcore Christian fundamentalists blink. These people, while not speaking for the majority of Obama supporters, are the most vocal, even going so far as to curse out and condemn those who deny their beloved candidate his rightful place as President. If you think I’m exaggerating, go look around the Internet. You’ll find them.

The thing is, these blowhards are only denying the truth: it doesn’t matter who wins this election. The problems that this country is facing, economically, socially, and environmentally, are complex problems that demand complex solutions. No one is willing to admit that, say, the economic system has gotten so messed up that we can predict the weather more easily than we can predict what’s going to happen on Wall Street. And I say this coming from a state in the Union where thunderstorms can and do pop up with little or no warning, and the best meteorologists in the country can’t see it coming. Our complex problems are going to require solutions that take a while. Anyone who claims to be able to fix things in less than five or ten years is lying to you.

It is this very Messianic perception of Obama that makes me not want to vote for him. The thing is, as Ozzy Osbourne says, “I don’t need another savior.” We can’t afford to wait around for a knight in shining armor to come and save us, because it’s never going to happen. Obama can win, and nothing will change. We will still have to face the problems we are facing unless we start to do something about it now. I don’t know about you, but I would rather do something and have a infinitesimal chance at survival than die waiting for the savior that will never come. By God and the Founding Fathers, if this country’s heading headlong towards the end, I want to go down fighting. That is where my hope lies, not in some idealized figure whom, whether you like it or not, is just as much a politician as the other guy.

Rate this:
2.8
Previous
  • Translator

    English flagChinese (Simplified) flagChinese (Traditional) flagDutch flagFrench flagGerman flagGreek flag
    Italian flagJapanese flagKorean flagPortuguese flagRussian flagSpanish flag 
    By N2H
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Polls

    Intermittent Poll Question: I think Higher Education is...

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...